I can’t believe it. I’ve received a response to my email to HMRC enquiring what will happen to the tax rate for retail investment funds when the corporate rates are coming down to 18%.
Someone thinks I’m important at last! (Now if only The Times Money section will admit their VCT error).
The answer is a nice straightforward – “They may be. Then again, they may not.”This is the original email I sent on Friday 31 July:
Date: 31 July 2015
Subject: Corporation Tax Main Rate and Authorised Investment Funds
Dear Miss Milner
I have a query about the forthcoming changes to the corporation tax main rate, which is intended to come down to 18% by 2020.
For many years, authorised unit trusts and OEICs have been subject to corporation tax at a special rate of 20% – this was at a time when the main corporation tax rate was higher at 30-33%. Technically they are taxed at the basic rate of income tax currently in force – which happens to be 20% (ICTA 1988 s 468(1A), followed by CTA 2010 s 614).
What is going to happen to authorised funds when the main corporate tax rate starts decreasing?
The Finance Bill as it currently stands sets out the future rates in Clause 7. However, these changes wouldn’t apply to authorised funds as they would still be subject to CTA 2010 s 614. I can’t find anything in the Bill that repeals the latter provision.
Is this intentional? Or is it intended that authorised funds will also be subject to the same 18% corporate rate in due course?
Thanking you in advance.
And this is the response I received on 5 August 2015 at about 18:15
Dear Mr Chanda
Thank you for your email. As you note, and as set out in CTA 2010 s 614, the rate of corporation tax in relation to an open-ended investment company is related to the basic rate of income tax, not the rate of corporation tax. The government has no plans to change this link.
Of course this doesn’t answer the question directly. The funds rate will remain linked to the basic rate of income tax – whether this rate will also come down to 18% is another matter. It is unlikely that such a rate change will be made just to satisfy the requirements of retail investment funds.
However, as mentioned in my previous article, these funds don’t pay much tax anyway, given the way that they are structured. Accordingly, the anomaly between the funds rate and the main corporate rate is unlikely to have an unduly adverse impact.
Latest posts by Satwaki Chanda (see all)
- Spring Budget 2017 – where are the documents? - Wednesday 8 March 2017
- Spring Budget 2017 announced Wednesday 8 March 2017 - Tuesday 20 December 2016
- Draft Finance Bill 2017 Documents are now available - Monday 5 December 2016
- Summer Budget 2015 – Goodwill Regained – but for how long?
- Corporate Tax rates are coming down to 18% – will the investment funds in your pension still be taxed at 20%?
- Summer Budget 2015 – Goodbye to Goodwill (and why I am laughing)
- Fifty Years of Corporation Tax in the UK – a conference at the Said Business School in Oxford
- Capital allowances case – mixed partnership denied annual investment allowance tax break